• Users Online: 745
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 

   Table of Contents      
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2019  |  Volume : 5  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 32-35

Utilization and safety of extracranial–intracranial bypass surgery in symptomatic steno-occlusive disorders


1 Department of Neurology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan, USA
2 Department of Neurosurgery, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan, USA
3 Department of Cardiology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan, USA
4 Department of Neurology, UT Health McGovern School of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA

Date of Submission24-Nov-2018
Date of Acceptance13-Mar-2019
Date of Web Publication27-Mar-2019

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Hamidreza Saber
University Health Center 8C, 4201 St Antoine St A, Detroit, MI 48201, Michigan
USA
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/bc.bc_33_18

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate patterns of utilization and safety of extracranial–intracranial (EC-IC) bypass in patients with symptomatic cerebrovascular steno-occlusive disorders.
METHODS: Patients with one of the steno-occlusive conditions (defined as symptomatic intracranial stenosis, extracranial stenosis, and moyamoya disease) were identified using all nonfederal hospitalizations in New York (2005–2014) and Florida (2005–2015). EC-IC bypass surgery was defined using the corresponding procedure codes. Patients were included if there was a prior history of ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack. Patients were excluded for any preceding diagnosis of cerebral hemorrhage, aneurysm, or trauma. The primary outcome was perioperative ischemic stroke, cerebral hemorrhage, or mortality occurring within 30 days of surgery. We also determined yearly trends for the volume of EC-IC bypass procedures in the study period.
RESULTS: Among 346 patients with steno-occlusive disease treated with EC-IC bypass, median age was 52.5 years and 52.5% were female. Rates of EC-IC bypass surgery procedure increased until 2011 and then decreased coinciding with the publication of the Carotid Occlusion Surgery Study trial. Thirty-day event rates of stroke, hemorrhage, or death decreased in patients treated with EC-IC bypass (odds ratio: 0.2, confidence interval: 0.0.4–0.99; P = 0.03) over the 10-year study period.
CONCLUSIONS: Overall utilization of EC-IC bypass procedure is relatively low, whereas the 30-day complication rates for patients with steno-occlusive conditions appear to be relatively low and improving. Further research is needed to confirm these findings and to determine the subset of patients who would most likely benefit from this intervention.

Keywords: Cerebrovascular steno-occlusive disease, extracranial–intracranial bypass, perioperative, stroke


How to cite this article:
Saber H, Rajah G, Palla M, Sheth SA. Utilization and safety of extracranial–intracranial bypass surgery in symptomatic steno-occlusive disorders. Brain Circ 2019;5:32-5

How to cite this URL:
Saber H, Rajah G, Palla M, Sheth SA. Utilization and safety of extracranial–intracranial bypass surgery in symptomatic steno-occlusive disorders. Brain Circ [serial online] 2019 [cited 2020 May 30];5:32-5. Available from: http://www.braincirculation.org/text.asp?2019/5/1/32/255025


  Introduction Top


The extracranial–intracranial (EC-IC) bypass surgery trial published in 1985 found no benefit for surgical bypass of carotid or middle cerebral steno-occlusive lesions with 12% 30-day morbidity and mortality and high bypass patency rates (96%).[1] The Japanese EC-IC Bypass Trial reported some benefits for the surgical cohort with a statistically lower stroke recurrence rate than the medical arm[2] although perioperative outcomes were not specified. The Carotid Occlusion Surgery Study (COSS) was published in 2011 with a conclusion that EC-IC bypass did not benefit symptomatic carotid occlusion patients with hemodynamic cerebral ischemia as defined by the study through positron emission tomography imaging. Thirty-day rates of perioperative morbidity and mortality for the surgical cohort were 14.4% in this trial.[3] Since then, the safety and efficacy of the procedure have been debated in the literature. More recent studies have reported the efficacy of the procedure for steno-occlusion in carefully selected patient populations.[4] Yeo et al. carefully selected patients using HMPAO single-photon emission computed tomography and found 13% ischemic event rates versus 45% event rates for the medical arm at a mean of 34 months, suggesting that surgical bypass in the right steno-occlusion candidate can be beneficial.[5] EC-IC bypass in moyamoya disease is a less contested topic where a large meta-analysis of 47 studies in adult moyamoya patients noted that direct bypass was associated with lower rates of hemorrhage, recurrent ischemic stroke, and better outcomes.[6]

The current trends on the utilization of the EC-IC bypass surgery in cerebrovascular steno-occlusive disorders are unclear. Furthermore, “real-world” population-level rates of perioperative stroke, hemorrhage, and mortality have not been well established following this procedure. We sought to examine the overall utilization of the EC-IC bypass procedure in two large and ethnically diverse states over a 10-year period. We also aimed to determine if the population-level rates of perioperative complications are comparable to those noted in published literature.


  Methods Top


Study design

We performed an observational cohort analysis, using administrative claims data from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project State Inpatient Databases on all discharges from nonfederal acute care hospitals in New York (2005–2014) and Florida (2005–2015). We chose the state inpatient data because they contain longitudinal follow-up data for individual patients by a unique linkage variable; thus, a patient can be tracked prospectively. In addition, Florida and New York were chosen because they are large demographically and socioeconomically diverse states containing a considerable proportion of the US population.

This analysis complied with the Reporting of Studies Conducted Using Observational Routinely Collected Health Data guidelines for administrative claims data.[7]

Demographic and procedural data

Diagnoses and procedures were identified using International Classification of Diseases (ICD-9) codes and derived from prior relevant literature for consistency and comparison.[8] Symptomatic Intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICD-9: 437.0), symptomatic occlusion or stenosis of the carotid artery (ICD-9: 433.10 and 433.11), and moyamoya disease (ICD-9: 437.5) were defined with the accompanying codes for ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA). Ischemic stroke was defined using previously validated techniques by ICD-9 codes 433.x1, 434.x1, or 436 in any hospital discharge diagnosis code position without a primary hospital discharge diagnosis code for rehabilitation (V57) or any accompanying codes for trauma (800–804 or 850–854), intracerebral hemorrhage (430 or 431), or subarachnoid hemorrhage (430).[8],[9]

TIA was defined as ICD-9 codes 435.x or V1254. EC-IC bypass surgery was defined as 39.28 with an accompanying code for steno-occlusive conditions as defined above.

Outcome and covariates

Patients entered the cohort at the time of their first hospitalization for one of the steno-occlusive conditions or EC-IC bypass. We analyzed trends for first-time EC-IC bypass performed for the symptomatic steno-occlusive conditions in this time period. The primary endpoint was a composite of immediate postprocedural and 30-day hospital admission for any ischemic stroke, cerebral hemorrhage, or mortality. Demographic characteristics (age, sex, and ethnicity), stroke risk factors (hypertension, diabetes, atrial fibrillation, coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, and chronic kidney disease), and a composite score of comorbidities using the Charlson index were ascertained.[10],[11]

Statistical analysis

Crude rates for the prevalence of each treatment strategy were reported with 95% confidence intervals. Multivariate regression models were adjusted for covariates described below and used to identify the predictors of the primary endpoint. The Charlson index was used as covariates in the multivariate model, and additional covariates for smoking, age (by tertile), and race were added as these are risk factors known to be associated with steno-occlusive conditions and not represented explicitly in the Charlson index.[10] Statistical analyses were performed using STATA 14 (College Station, TX) and GraphPad Prism 7.0 (La Jolla, CA) software.


  Results Top


Patient population

Among the 346 individuals who underwent EC-IC bypass, median age was 52.5 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 41–62) and 57.23% were female. Overall, 33.5% of the included patients had diabetes and 67.6% carried a diagnosis of hypertension. The Charlson morbidity index was 3 (IQR: 2–5). [Table 1] shows the baseline characteristics in the cohort.
Table 1: Baseline characteristics of the included patients following extracranial–intracranial bypass

Click here to view


Extracranial–intracranial utilization

The national trends for utilization over the study period in the state inpatient data and the volume of first-time EC-IC bypass surgery for cerebrovascular steno-occlusive diseases increased steadily until 2011 and then declined, as shown in [Figure 1].
Figure 1: Extracranial–intracranial bypass surgery utilization trend for cerebrovascular steno-occlusive disorders using Florida and New York State Inpatient Databases

Click here to view


Thirty-day outcomes

Overall, the 30-day rate of stroke, hemorrhage, or death in the entire cohort was 5.49% for patients with symptomatic cerebrovascular steno-occlusive conditions who were treated with EC-IC bypass. The overall combined event rate for a given year ranged from 2.8% to 16.6% in the study period. After adjusting for Charlson index, age, and race, there was a statistically significant decline in the likelihood of 30-day combined outcome for the EC-IC bypass (odds ratio: 0.2, CI: 0.0.4–0.99; P = 0.03) over the 10-year study period. [Figure 2] shows the change over time for the combined outcome.
Figure 2: Trends in 30-day risk of death, stroke, or hemorrhage following extracranial–intracranial bypass surgery using Florida and New York State Inpatient Databases

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


In this cohort study over a 10-year time period, we observed an initial increase in utilization of EC-IC bypass (2005–2010), followed by a decrease in 2011, coinciding with the publication of the COSS trial.[3] Overall rates of 30-day stroke, hemorrhage, and mortality in our cohort were relatively low (range: 2.8%–16.6%) and within the range of event rates reported in prior randomized trials.[12] Over the study period, this rate appeared to be decreasing.

The decline in EC-IC bypass utilization in 2011 may be related to the release of clinical trial findings during the study period. The COSS trial was performed to assess the effectiveness of the EC-IC bypass surgery in reducing subsequent stroke in patients with symptomatic atherosclerotic internal carotid artery occlusion and hemodynamic cerebral ischemia.[3] The authors concluded that EC-IC bypass surgery did not reduce the risk of recurrent ipsilateral ischemic stroke at 2 years as compared to medical therapy alone. It should be noted that the 30-day morbidity and mortality was 15% in this trial, which was comparable to the rate of 12% reported from the EC-IC Bypass Trial.[1] The COSS trial was halted for futility despite only a 6% rate (3% per year) of recurrent ipsilateral stroke in the surgical arm for the remainder of the 2-year follow-up after the 30-day period versus the 23% rate of combined endpoint in the medical arm. Although our perioperative event rates may not be directly comparable to the rates from randomized trials given the variations in patient selection and outcome ascertainment, a declining trend in overall perioperative morbidity and mortality may suggest a signal for the effectiveness of this procedure for improving long-term outcomes in well-selected groups of patients in future trials.

Several factors may affect the risk of perioperative events following EC-IC bypass. Importantly, hemodynamic fragility has been shown to be a major contributing factor in the development of postoperative complications.[13] Recently, Rice et al. reported a series of 126 patients who underwent EC-IC bypass for ischemic stroke or recent TIA and found that in those patients undergoing the procedure within 7 days of their event, the perioperative stroke rate was 31%, as compared to 11.5% for those undergoing surgery at >7 days.[14] Thus, future studies with better identification of the optimal timing of the procedure may contribute to improvements in perioperative outcomes.

EC-IC bypass may also be beneficial in other steno-occlusive conditions such as acute ischemic stroke.[15] Horiuchi et al. described 58 patients undergoing urgent revascularization via superficial temporal artery–middle cerebral artery bypass with 69% of patients having neurological improvement.[16] Our population-level findings of a relatively acceptable perioperative morbidity risk following EC-IC bypass would support this intervention as a viable treatment option in future trials for patients who fail first-line endovascular thrombectomy. Similar lines of reasoning may be used to propose this procedure as a safe option in future trials that aim to assess changes in cognitive outcomes following cerebral revascularization in moyamoya disease.

Our study has several limitations, many of which are inherent to administrative databases and nonrandomized cohort data. We cannot make direct comparisons between EC-IC bypass and other procedures or conservative therapies in the absence of a randomized design, as the features of the patients' presentation and imaging that drive the decision to select a treatment strategy cannot be obtained from administrative data. In addition, we cannot determine specific clinical characteristics including site of vascular occlusion. While the validity of our findings relies largely on the correct procedural coding, our large state-level analysis provides unique insights into the “real world” milieu of EC-IC bypass surgery and their utilization, especially given the fact that this type of information cannot be obtained from trials or registries. Future studies are needed in the optimization of EC-IC bypass indications and outcomes for steno-occlusive diseases.


  Conclusion Top


The overall utilization of the EC-IC bypass procedure is low. Further research is needed to confirm these findings and to determine the subset of patients who would most likely benefit from this intervention.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
  References Top

1.
EC/IC Bypass Study Group. Failure of extracranial-intracranial arterial bypass to reduce the risk of ischemic stroke. Results of an international randomized trial. N Engl J Med 1985;313:1191-200.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
JET Study Group. Japanese EC-IC bypass trial (JET study): The second interim analysis. Surg Cereb Stroke 2002;30:434-7. Available from: http://www.joi.jlc.jst.go.jp/JST.JSTAGE/scs/30.434?from=CrossRef. [Last accessed on 2018 Oct 01].  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Powers WJ, Clarke WR, Grubb RL Jr., Videen TO, Adams HP Jr., Derdeyn CP, et al. Extracranial-intracranial bypass surgery for stroke prevention in hemodynamic cerebral ischemia: The carotid occlusion surgery study randomized trial. JAMA 2011;306:1983-92.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Teo KA, Ning C, Sein L, Yeo TT, Sharma VK. Long-term outcome in extracranial-intracranial bypass surgery for severe steno-occlusive disease of intracranial internal carotid or middle cerebral artery. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2018;169:149-53.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Leonard Y, Prakash P, Aftab A, Arvind SK, Hockluen T, Vincent CF, et al. Improvement in cerebral hemodynamic parameters and outcome after superficial temporal artery- middle cerebral artery bypass in patients with severe steno-occlusive disease of intracranial carotid and middle cerebral artery. Stroke 2018;46:A74.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Sun H, Wilson C, Ozpinar A, Safavi-Abbasi S, Zhao Y, Nakaji P, et al. Perioperative complications and long-term outcomes after bypasses in adults with moyamoya disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World Neurosurg 2016;92:179-88.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Benchimol EI, Smeeth L, Guttmann A, Harron K, Moher D, Petersen I, et al. The REporting of studies conducted using observational routinely-collected health data (RECORD) statement. PLoS Med 2015;12:e1001885.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Tirschwell DL, Longstreth WT Jr. Validating administrative data in stroke research. Stroke 2002;33:2465-70.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Kamel H, Navi BB, Sriram N, Hovsepian DA, Devereux RB, Elkind MS. Risk of a thrombotic event after the 6-week postpartum period. N Engl J Med 2014;370:1307-15. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24524551. [Last accessed on 2018 Oct 01].  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validation. J Chronic Dis 1987;40:373-83.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Quan H, Li B, Couris CM, Fushimi K, Graham P, Hider P, et al. Updating and validating the charlson comorbidity index and score for risk adjustment in hospital discharge abstracts using data from 6 countries. Am J Epidemiol 2011;173:676-82.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Grubb RL Jr., Powers WJ, Clarke WR, Videen TO, Adams HP Jr., Derdeyn CP, et al. Surgical results of the carotid occlusion surgery study. J Neurosurg 2013;118:25-33.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Reynolds MR, Grubb RL Jr., Clarke WR, Powers WJ, Zipfel GJ, Adams HP Jr., et al. Investigating the mechanisms of perioperative ischemic stroke in the carotid occlusion surgery study. J Neurosurg 2013;119:988-95.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Rice CJ, Cho SM, Taqui A, Moore NZ, Witek AM, Bain MD, et al. Early versus delayed extracranial-intracranial bypass surgery in symptomatic atherosclerotic occlusion. Neurosurgery 2018. Available From: nyy411, https://doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyy411. [Last accessed on 2019 Feb 15].  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Park HS, Kim SH, Nah HW, Choi JH, Kim DH, Kang MJ, et al. Patient selection and clinical efficacy of urgent superficial temporal artery-middle cerebral artery bypass in acute ischemic stroke using advanced magnetic resonance imaging techniques. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 2017;13:552-9.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Horiuchi T, Nitta J, Ishizaka S, Kanaya K, Yanagawa T, Hongo K. Emergency EC-IC bypass for symptomatic atherosclerotic ischemic stroke. Neurosurg Rev 2013;36:559-64.  Back to cited text no. 16
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]


This article has been cited by
1 Extracranial-intracranial bypass surgery for occlusive atherosclerotic disease of the anterior cerebral circulation: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
Xuesong Bai,Yao Feng,Kun Yang,Tao Wang,Jichang Luo,Xue Wang,Feng Ling,Yan Ma,Liqun Jiao
Systematic Reviews. 2020; 9(1)
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Circular RNAs and neutrophils: Key factors in tackling asymptomatic moyamoya disease
Sydney Corey,Yumin Luo
Brain Circulation. 2019; 5(3): 150
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
References
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1014    
    Printed71    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded147    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 2    

Recommend this journal