|Year : 2015 | Volume
| Issue : 1 | Page : 47-52
Intracranial atherosclerosis and inflammation: Lessons from the East and the West
Juan F Arenillas
Department of Neurology, Hospital ClínicoUniversitario, University of Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain
|Date of Submission||08-May-2015|
|Date of Acceptance||15-Jun-2015|
|Date of Web Publication||30-Sep-2015|
Juan F Arenillas
Department of Neurology, Hospital Clínico Universitario, University of Valladolid, Ramón y Cajal 3, Valladolid - 47003
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Intracranial atherosclerosis (ICAS) is a major cause of ischemic stroke worldwide. Patients affected by this disease have a high risk of suffering further ischemic strokes and other major vascular events despite the best medical therapy available. However, identification of factors that characterize a high-risk ICAS patient is a clinical problem that is yet to be solved. Inflammation is known to play a crucial role in all the stages of atherosclerosis affecting extracranial arterial beds but its role in ICAS is not firmly established. Circulating inflammatory biomarkers may represent a valuable tool to assess the importance of systemic and local (intraplaque) inflammation in ICAS pathogenesis. In this article, we have reviewed studies with inflammatory biomarkers performed in symptomatic and asymptomatic ICAS patients published in the recent literature. Their findings strongly support the hypothesis that inflammation determines the risk of progression and complication of symptomatic ICAS.
Keywords: Atherosclerosis, biomarkers, inflammation, intracranial, intracranial stenosis
|How to cite this article:|
Arenillas JF. Intracranial atherosclerosis and inflammation: Lessons from the East and the West. Brain Circ 2015;1:47-52
| Intracranial Atherosclerosis and Translational Research|| |
The ultimate aim of translational research is to provide applicable solutions to relevant clinical problems by means of a continuous crosstalk between clinical studies and basic research, as shown in [Figure 1].  Intracranial atherosclerosis (ICAS) is characterized by the development, progression, and complication of atherosclerotic plaques affecting the intracranial large arteries. ICAS represents the most common cause of ischemic stroke among patients of Asian ancestry. , Moreover, ICAS is more prevalent among Hispanics and Africans whereas in Caucasians, ICAS may account for 8-10% of all ischemic strokes.  Thus, taking the distribution of the world's population into account, ICAS may represent the most common cause of stroke globally. 
|Figure 1: Translational research in ICAS Stages of translational research in ICAS: 1) Identification of the most relevant clinical problems that remain to be solved through clinical observation 2) Development of clinical and basic research models oriented to solve the clinical problem (patient-oriented) 3) Cyclic crosstalk between clinical and basic research by which the findings obtained at each level influence methodology and result in interpretation at the other level 4) Clinical trial design and development based on the results of basic research and clinical pilot studies|
Click here to view
According to these observations, ICAS represents a major health problem worldwide. However, there are important clinical problems affecting ICAS patients that are yet to be solved and these present as potential targets for translational research. First, symptomatic ICAS is still burdened with a high risk of recurrent stroke despite the best medical therapy although the aggressive medical treatment with or without stenting in high-risk patients with intracranial artery stenosis (SAMMPRIS) medical treatment paradigm was able to reduce the annual recurrence rate by almost 50% as compared to the rate reported in the Warfarin-Aspirin Symptomatic Intracranial Disease (WASID) study less than one decade earlier. , Second, symptomatic ICAS patients are burdened with a high global vascular risk and frequently have concomitant coronary heart and peripheral arterial diseases. , Therefore, the identification of factors that characterize high-risk ICAS patients is highly necessary. Third, the real importance of ICAS may be underestimated, especially in Caucasians. Traditionally, ICAS diagnosis has been done based on the detection of intracranial stenosis, but as high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (HRMRI) artery-wall studies have shown, arterial remodeling is present in the intracranial arteries and accordingly, nonstenotic ICAS may become a common yet underrecognized problem.  Fourth, the relationship between ICAS, vascular cognitive impairment, and Alzheimer's disease is unclear and intriguing.  In this article, we have focused on the characterization of high-risk ICAS and more concretely, we attempted to review the evidence regarding the role of inflammation in determining the risks of progression and complication of ICAS.
| Inflammation in Atherosclerosis: Local and Systemic Views|| |
Atherosclerosis is a chronic inflammatory process of lipid-rich lesion growth in the vascular wall that can cause myocardial infarction and stroke among other clinical consequences.  An increased mechanistic understanding of the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis in other vascular beds has shown that inflammation plays a crucial role in all stages of atherothrombosis, from early atherosclerotic lesion formation to its progression and destabilization leading to clinical events. The dynamics of atherosclerosis over time can be seen as a struggle between the processes of vascular injury and repair where persistent inflammation leads to a predominance of aggressive mechanisms and a derangement of vascular reparative capacity. From a clinician's perspective, inflammation requires to be assessed in vivo and in real-time in order to be incorporated in the diagnosis and treatment of atherosclerotic patients. Extensive research is being carried out to develop imaging and molecular methods that will be able to detect and measure vascular inflammation such as positron emission tomography-magnetic resonance imaging (PET-MRI), HRMRI with inflammation-targeted contrasts, molecular imaging, and biomarkers.
The relationship between inflammation and atherosclerosis might have to be considered from both a local and a systemic perspective.  Locally, inflammatory infiltration within the atherosclerotic lesion renders the plaque more vulnerable, i.e., prone to rupture and suffer thrombotic complications. Systemically, persisting chronic inflammation is characterized by excessive circulating inflammatory cells and proinflammatory cytokines. Circulating monocytes can be recruited inside the evolving atherosclerotic lesion via adhesion molecules expressed on the dysfunctional endothelium and can then enter the plaque, thereby kindling inflammation inside it. Moreover, circulating inflammatory cytokines originating from different sources may exert their effects on the endothelium, rendering it more proinflammatory and prothrombotic. In this context, inflammatory blood biomarkers may represent a valuable tool to assess in vivo and in real-time the interplay between systemic and local inflammations. Vascular risk factors such as hypertension and hypercholesterolemia can induce the expression of circulating inflammatory mediators that lead to altered wall function and promotion of atherosclerosis progression. While the overexpression of some inflammatory mediators such as interleukin-6 (IL-6) and C-reactive protein (CRP) may inform us about the existence of an ongoing chronic systemic inflammation;  other inflammatory molecules such as lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A 2 (Lp-PLA 2 ) are released into the blood stream from the inflammatory cells that reside inside the atherosclerotic lesion, thus reflecting the plaques' intrinsic inflammatory activity. 
| Inflammation and Icas: Unresolved Questions|| |
While the deleterious role of persisting inflammation in atherosclerosis is clear in all extracranial arterial beds, the lack of access to pathological specimens from symptomatic ICAS patients makes it difficult to ascertain how inflammation is involved in ICAS pathogenesis. [Figure 2] illustrates the main groups of prognostic factors that may influence the outcome of symptomatic ICAS according to the recent literature. Regarding the factors associated with the intracranial atherosclerotic plaque itself, more attention is increasingly being paid to plaque activity. In this context, what we know from other arterial territories is that not only are plaque morphology and the degree of stenosis relevant but that plaque activity may also play a crucial role in determining the atherosclerotic lesion's risk. Moreover, due to the process of arterial remodeling, large atherosclerotic plaques may grow outwardly without causing overt stenosis. The main question that remains to be clarified here is whether the inflammatory state of the plaque is the main contributor to the risk of giving rise to acute clinical events in ICAS as it happens in other arterial beds.
|Figure 2: Symptomatic ICAS prognostic factor schema The main prognostic factors in symptomatic ICAS that we know, thanks to the research done during the last few decades, could be summarized following this schema. These groups of factors interact among themselves in each ICAS patient and determine the risk of disease progression and clinical recurrence. Inflammation may have a dual role in ICAS since the inflammatory response is controlled systemically and at the same time, local inflammatory infiltration inside the atheromatous plaque may determine plaque activity. In fact, inflammation typically exemplifies the intimate interplay between systemic and local factors that may be as crucial for ICAS as it is for atherosclerosis affecting other arterial beds|
Click here to view
Why would atherosclerosis have a differential behavior in intracranial arteries? Why do some investigators believe that it is not possible to directly extrapolate what we have learnt from other arterial territories and just apply it to ICAS? First, some classic reports based on necropsy series stated that atheromatous plaques found in intracranial arteries were frequently stable and did not often show the morphological features traditionally associated with vulnerable plaques. , This vision has dominated the field until recent works demonstrated that symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic plaques can exhibit the hallmarks of unstable plaques such as intraplaque vasculature, intraplaque hemorrhage, or plaque rupture. ,, And second, intracranial arteries have differential anatomic features and are exposed to particular hemodynamic factors. They are muscular-type arteries that contain only a few medial elastic fibers, a thick and dense internal elastic lamina, and a few adventitial vasa vasorum, and they lack an external elastic lamina.  Moreover, the compliance of the aorta and the carotid arteries maintains a low pulse pressure in the intracranial arteries, retarding the development of ICAS until the extracranial arteries' stiffness increases with age and exposure to vascular risk factors. In addition, intracranial arteries were reported with an enhanced antioxidant capacity.  These unique features are claimed to justify the special characteristics of intracranial atherosclerotic lesions found in the recent necropsy series such as fibrosis, small lipid pools, and a low grade of inflammatory infiltration by macrophages and T cells.  However, this necropsy study was performed in asymptomatic patients and this theoretical plaque stability is a contrast with to the aggressive clinical behavior of this disease once it becomes symptomatic as has been mentioned earlier in this manuscript. Other recent studies found increased inflammatory infiltration in the middle cerebral artery symptomatic versus asymptomatic atherosclerotic lesions.  Therefore, further research is needed to clarify this issue.
New imaging methods such as HRMRI may help us understand the real importance of inflammation in ICAS and whether it varies between individuals and also across the different intracranial arteries. The first study aiming to correlate HRMRI findings with plaque histology showed little inflammation inside the basilar artery plaque, although the plaque was not deemed to be symptomatic.  Interestingly, HRMRI postcontrast enhancement of intracranial atherosclerotic plaques is more frequent in symptomatic plaques than in asymptomatic plaques but whether this phenomenon reflects the degree of inflammatory infiltration inside the plaque is yet to be elucidated. 
| Inflammatory Biomarkers in ICAS|| |
Together with wall-imaging techniques, biomarker studies represent another valuable method to assess the participation of inflammation in ICAS in vivo. [Table 1] summarizes some of the most relevant studies with inflammatory blood biomarkers in ICAS, which have been published during the past 15 years. ,,,,,,,,,,,,, These studies can be categorized in three groups. The first group comprises cross-sectional studies conducted on stroke patients where biomarker concentration is compared across different stroke subtypes, including ICAS. ,,, Among them, the study conducted in Caucasian patients showed that the ICAS group had the highest level of adhesion molecules, which first suggested the existence of an endothelial inflammatory activation in this condition.  However, the other three studies conducted on Asian patients found significantly lower concentrations of CRP and matrix metalloproteinase 2 (MMP-2) in the ICAS group as compared to the extracranial atherosclerosis group.
The strongest evidence in favor of the involvement of inflammation in ICAS pathogenesis comes from the second group of longitudinal studies, which evaluated the capacity of several inflammatory biomarkers to predict ICAS progression ,, and the risk of recurrent stroke and other vascular events in symptomatic ICAS patients. ,,, Baseline CRP  and IL-6  level in Caucasian and Asian symptomatic ICAS patients, respectively, predicted ICAS progression in long-term follow-up studies. Regarding the risk of clinical recurrence, biomarkers of systemic inflammation, such as CRP and leukocyte count, were also found to be predictors of further ischemic strokes and other major vascular events in symptomatic ICAS patients. ,, Taken together, these findings suggest that persisting systemic inflammation may promote the progression and complication of atherosclerosis in the intracranial arteries also, as it does extracranially. Besides these markers of systemic inflammation, other molecules that are more informative about the local inflammatory activity within the atherosclerotic plaque, such as adhesion molecules and Lp-PLA 2 , have also been evaluated in these longitudinal studies. , In this context, the most relevant findings were derived from the Biomarkers of Ischemic Outcomes in Symptomatic Intracranial Stenosis (BIOSIS) study, a biomarker study affiliated with the SAMMPRIS clinical trial the results of which were presented partially at the 2014 International Stroke Conference.  Interestingly, Lp-PLA 2 level at the study entry predicted specifically further ischemic strokes within the symptomatic intracranial stenosis territory as well as any major ischemic event during follow-up. This observation strongly supports the hypothesis that local inflammation inside the intracranial atherosclerotic plaque may determine its risk of complication, giving rise to further clinical events.
Finally, the third group of investigations comprises population-based studies aiming to identify factors associated with asymptomatic ICAS in apparently healthy individuals. ,, According to those investigating, the relevance of systemic inflammation in the development of asymptomatic ICAS remains controversial. In two of the investigations, the CRP level was found to be lower in asymptomatic ICAS than in extracranial atherosclerosis; , the largest study identified CRP as an independent predictor of asymptomatic ICAS and intracranial atheromatous burden.
Regarding their potential clinical applicability, inflammatory biomarkers in ICAS could be very useful for:
- Risk stratification in ICAS patients by helping to identify those patients at a higher risk of future ischemic stroke or major vascular events, thus aiding in preventive strategies design;
- The evaluation and monitoring of the intensity of plaque's inflammatory activity over time and its response to different therapies; and
- The identification of new therapeutic targets and drugs against ICAS progression and complication.
In order to develop this promising potential and be able to incorporate inflammatory biomarkers into the clinical routine, some of the highest priorities for future research would be:
- New biomarker discovery using molecular pathway's arrays and "omics" technology,
- Advanced statistics to identify biomarkers whose predictive capacity has an added value over the prediction provided by well-established risk factors in ICAS,
- Multimodal studies combining modern imaging methods and biomarker technology, and
- Basic research with biomarkers in animal models of ICAS.
| Conclusion|| |
A growing body of evidence provided by biomarker studies strongly supports the hypothesis that inflammation is involved in the progression and complication of symptomatic ICAS. Thus, inflammatory biomarkers may have an increasing clinical applicability in the identification of high-risk ICAS patients and in monitoring the response to preventive therapies. Moreover, some of the biomarkers themselves could become therapeutic targets for new anti-inflammatory strategies. Finally, multimodal studies combining modern imaging methods and novel biomarker technology might be needed to clarify the role of inflammation in ICAS and its therapeutic potential.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Caplan LR, Arenillas J, Cramer SC, Joutel A, Lo EH, Meschia J, et al
. Stroke-related translational research. Arch Neurol 2011;68:1110-23.
Wong KS, Huang YN, Gao S, Lam WW, Chan YL, Kay R. Intracranial stenosis in Chinese patients with acute stroke. Neurology 1998;50:812-3.
Kim JT, Yoo SH, Kwon JH, Kwon SU, Kim JS. Subtyping of ischemic stroke based on vascular imaging: Analysis of 1,167 acute, consecutive patients. J ClinNeurol 2006;2:225-30.
Sacco RL, Kargman DE, Gu Q, Zamanillo MC. Race-ethnicity and determinants of intracranial atherosclerotic cerebral infarction: The Northern Manhattan Stroke Study. Stroke 1995;26:14-20.
Gorelick PB, Wong KS, Bae HJ, Pandey DK. Large artery intracranial occlusive disease: A large worldwide burden but a relatively neglected frontier. Stroke 2008;39:2396-9.
Chimowitz MI, Lynn MJ, Howlett-Smith H, Stern BJ, Hertzberg VS, Frankel MR, et al.
Warfarin-Aspirin Symptomatic Intracranial Disease Trial Investigators. Comparison of warfarin and aspirin for symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis. N Engl J Med 2005;352:1305-16.
Chimowitz MI, Lynn MJ, Derdeyn CP, Turan TN, Fiorella D, Lane BF, et al
. SAMMPRIS Trial Investigators. Stenting versus aggressive medical therapy for intracranial arterial stenosis. N Engl J Med 2011;365:993-1003.
Arenillas JF, Candell-Riera J, Romero-Farina G, Molina CA, Chacón P, Aguadé-Bruix S, et al
. Silentmyocardial ischemia in patients with symptomatic intracranial atherosclerosis: Associated factors. Stroke 2005;36:1201-6.
Massot A, Giralt D, Penalba A, Garcia-Berrocoso T, Navarro-Sobrino M, Arenillas JF, et al
. Predictive value of ankle-brachial index and PAI-1 in symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic disease recurrence. Atherosclerosis 2014;233:186-9.
Arenillas JF. Intracranial atherosclerosis: Current concepts. Stroke 2011;42(Suppl):S20-3.
Roher AE, Tyas SL, Maarouf CL, Daugs ID, Kokjohn TA, Emmerling MR, et al
. Intracranial atherosclerosis as a contributing factor to Alzheimer's disease dementia. Alzheimers Dement 2011;7:436-44.
Libby P. Inflammation in atherosclerosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2012;32:2045-51.
Ridker PM, Cannon CP, Morrow D, Rifai N, Rose LM, McCabe CH, et al
. Pravastatin or Atorvastatin Evaluation and InfectionTherapy-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 22 (PROVE IT-TIMI 22) Investigators. C-reactive protein levels and outcomes after statin therapy. N Engl J Med 2005;352:20-8.
Virani SS, Nambi V. The role of lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 as a marker for atherosclerosis. CurrAtheroscler Rep 2007;9:97-103.
LHermitte F, Gautier JC, Derouesné C, Guiraud B. Ischemic accidents in the middle cerebral artery territory. A study of the causes in 122 cases. Arch Neurol 1968;19:248-56.
Lammie GA, Sandercock PA, Dennis MS. Recently occluded intracranial and extracranial carotid arteries. Relevance of the unstable atherosclerotic plaque. Stroke 1999;30:1319-25.
Ogata J, Masuda J, Yutani C, Yamaguchi T. Mechanisms of cerebral artery thrombosis: Ahistopathological analysis on eight necropsy cases. J NeurolNeurosurg Psychiatry 1994;57:17-21.
Chen XY, Wong KS, Lam WW, Zhao HL, Ng HK. Middle cerebral artery atherosclerosis: Histological comparison between plaques associated with and not associated with infarct in a postmortem study. Cerebrovasc Dis 2008;25:74-80.
Meyers PM, Schumacher HC, Gray WA, Fifi J, Gaudet JG, Heyer EJ, et al
. Intravascular ultrasound of symptomatic intracranial stenosis demonstrates atherosclerotic plaque with intraplaque hemorrhage: A case report. J Neuroimaging 2009;19:266-70.
Ritz K, Denswil NP, Stam OC, van Lieshout JJ, Daemen MJ. Cause and mechanisms of intracranial atherosclerosis. Circulation 2014;130:1407-14.
Napoli C, Witztum JL, de Nigris F, Palumbo G, D'Armiento FP, Palinski W. Intracranial arteries of human fetuses are more resistant to hypercholesterolemia- induced fatty streak formation than extracranial arteries. Circulation 1999;99:2003-10.
Turan TN, Rumboldt Z, Granholm AC, Columbo L, Welsh CT, Lopes-Virella MF, et al
. Intracranial atherosclerosis: Correlation between in-vivo
3T high resolution MRI and pathology. Atherosclerosis 2014;237:460-3.
Skarpathiotakis M, Mandell DM, Swartz RH, Tomlinson G, Mikulis DJ. Intracranial atherosclerotic plaque enhancement in patients with ischemic stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:299-304.
Fassbender K, Bertsch T, Mielke O, Mühlhauser F, Hennerici M. Adhesion molecules in cerebrovascular diseases. Evidence for an inflammatory endothelial activation in cerebral large- and small-vessel disease. Stroke 1999;30:1647-50.
Arenillas JF, Alvarez-Sabín J, Molina CA, Chacón P, Montaner J, Rovira A, et al
. C-reactive protein predicts further ischemic events in first-ever transient ischemic attack or stroke patients with intracranial large-artery occlusive disease. Stroke 2003;34:2463-8.
Bang OY, Lee PH, Yoon SR, Lee MA, Joo IS, Huh K. Inflammatory markers, rather than conventional risk factors, are different between carotid and MCA atherosclerosis. J NeurolNeurosurg Psychiatry 2005;76:1128-34.
Bang OY, Lee MA, Lee JH, Kim JW, Lee PH, Joo IS, et al
. Association of metabolic syndrome and C-reactive protein levels with intracranial atherosclerotic stroke. J ClinNeurol 2005;1:69-75.
Ovbiagele B, Lynn MJ, Saver JL, Chimowitz MI; WASID Study Group. Leukocyte count and vascular risk in symptomatic intracranial atherosclerosis. CerebrovascDis 2007;24:283-8.
Arenillas JF, Alvarez-Sabín J, Molina CA, Chacón P, Fernández-Cadenas I, Ribó M, et al
. Progression of symptomatic intracranial large artery atherosclerosis is associated with a proinflammatory state and impaired fibrinolysis. Stroke 2008;39:1456-63.
Massot A, Pelegri D, Penalba A, Arenillas J, Boada C, Giralt D, et al
. Lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 testing usefulness among patients with symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic disease. Atherosclerosis 2011;218:181-7.
Jeon SB, Chun S, Choi-Kwon S, Chi HS, Nah HW, Kwon SU, et al
. Biomarkers and location of atherosclerosis: Matrix metalloproteinase-2 may be related to intracranial atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis 2012;223:442-7.
Shimizu K, Shimomura K, Tokuyama Y, Sakurai K, Isahaya K, Takaishi S, et al
. Association between inflammatory biomarkers and progression of intracranial large artery stenosis after ischemic stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2013;22:211-7.
Men X, Li J, Zhang B, Zhang L, Li H, Lu Z. Homocysteine and C-reactive protein associated with progression and prognosis of intracranial branch atheromatous disease. PLoS One 2013;8:e73030.
Frankel MR, Quyyumi A, Zhao Y, Long Q, Le N, Waller EK, et al
. BIOSIS and SAMMPRIS investigators. Biomarkers of ischemic outcomes in symptomatic intracranial stenosis (BIOSIS) - Preliminary results. Stroke 2014;45:ATMP33.
Takahashi W, Ohnuki T, Ohnuki Y, Kawada S, Takagi S. The role of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein in asymptomatic intra- and extracranial large artery diseases. Cerebrovasc Dis 2008;26:549-55.
López-Cancio E, Galán A, Dorado L, Jiménez M, Hernández M, Millán M, et al
. Biological signatures of asymptomatic extra- and intracranial atherosclerosis: The Barcelona-AsIA (Asymptomatic Intracranial Atherosclerosis) study. Stroke 2012;43:2712-9.
Wang J, Liu Y, Zhang L, Li N, Wang C, Gao X, et al
. Associations of high sensitivity C-reactive protein levels with the prevalence ofasymptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis. Eur J Neurol 2014;21:512-8.
[Figure 1], [Figure 2]
|This article has been cited by|
||Vitamin D levels and C-reactive protein/albumin ratio in pregnant women with cerebral venous sinus thrombosis
| ||Recep Yevgi,Nuray Bilge,Fatma Simsek,Alper Eren,Gamze Nur Cimilli Senocak |
| ||Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis. 2021; |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Blood biomarkers of progressive atherosclerosis and restenosis after stenting of symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis
| ||Melanie Haidegger,Markus Kneihsl,Kurt Niederkorn,Hannes Deutschmann,Harald Mangge,Christian Vetta,Michael Augustin,Gerit Wünsch,Simon Fandler-Höfler,Susanna Horner,Christian Enzinger,Thomas Gattringer |
| ||Scientific Reports. 2021; 11(1) |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Anti-inflammatory approaches to ischaemic stroke prevention
| ||Peter J Kelly,Sean Murphy,Sarah Coveney,Francisco Purroy,Robin Lemmens,Georgios Tsivgoulis,Chris Price |
| ||Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. 2018; 89(2): 211 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Inflammation is correlated with severity and outcome of cerebral venous thrombosis
| ||Liyan Wang,Jiangang Duan,Tingting Bian,Ran Meng,Longfei Wu,Zhen Zhang,Xuxiang Zhang,Chunxiu Wang,Xunming Ji |
| ||Journal of Neuroinflammation. 2018; 15(1) |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Spanning from the West to East: An Updated Review on Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Atherosclerotic Disease
| ||Mohammed Hussain,Neil Datta,Zhe Cheng,David Dornbos,Asif Bashir,Ibrahim Sultan,Tapan Mehta,Faris Shweikeh,Paul Mazaris,Nora Lee,Amre Nouh,Xiaokun Geng,Yuchuan Ding |
| ||Aging and Disease. 2017; 8(2): 196 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||NOX Activation by Subunit Interaction and Underlying Mechanisms in Disease
| ||Radhika Rastogi,Xiaokun Geng,Fengwu Li,Yuchuan Ding |
| ||Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience. 2017; 10 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||The cerebral circulation and cerebrovascular disease II: Pathogenesis of cerebrovascular disease
| ||Ankush Chandra, ChristopherR Stone, WilliamA Li, Xiaokun Geng, Yuchuan Ding |
| ||Brain Circulation. 2017; 3(2): 57 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Risk of hemorrhagic transformation after ischemic stroke in patients with antiphospholipid antibody syndrome
| ||Tapan Mehta,Mohammed Hussain,Khushboo Sheth,Yuchuan Ding,Louise D. McCullough |
| ||Neurological Research. 2017; 39(6): 477 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Omega-3 fatty acid supplement prevents development of intracranial atherosclerosis
| ||Jiamei Shen,Adam Hafeez,James Stevenson,Jianjie Yang,Changbin Yin,Fengwu Li,Sainan Wang,Huishan Du,Xunming Ji,Jose A. Rafols,Xiaokun Geng,Yuchuan Ding |
| ||Neuroscience. 2016; 334: 226 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|