• Users Online: 333
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 

   Table of Contents      
REVIEW ARTICLE
Year : 2016  |  Volume : 2  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 141-145

Nonhuman primate model in clinical modeling of diseases for stem cell therapy


1 Southwest National Primate Research Center, Texas Biomedical Research Institute, San Antonio, Texas, USA
2 Southwest National Primate Research Center, Texas Biomedical Research Institute; Department of Cellular and Structural Biology, UT Health Science Center; Department of Radiology, Medical School, UT Health Science Center, San Antonio, Texas, USA

Date of Submission31-Jul-2016
Date of Decision16-Aug-2016
Date of Acceptance06-Sep-2016
Date of Web Publication18-Oct-2016

Correspondence Address:
Marcel M Daadi
Southwest National Primate Research Center, Texas Biomedical Research Institute, San Antonio, Texas, Department of Cellular and Structural Biology, UT Health Science Center, San Antonio, Texas, Department of Radiology, Medical School, UT Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX
USA
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/2394-8108.192524

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 

Nonhuman primates (NHPs) are alike humans in size, behavior, physiology, biochemistry, and immunology. Given close similarities to humans, the NHP model offers exceptional opportunities to understand the biological mechanisms and translational applications with direct relevance to human conditions. Here, we evaluate the opportunities and limitations of NHPs as animal models for translational regenerative medicine. NHP models of human disease propose exceptional opportunities to advance stem cell-based therapy by addressing pertinent translational concerns related to this research. Nonetheless, the value of these primates must be carefully assessed, taking into account the expense of specialized equipment and requirement of highly specialized staff. Well-designed initial fundamental studies in small animal models are essential before translating research into NHP models and eventually into human trials. In addition, we suggest that applying a directed and collaborative approach, as seen in the evolution of stroke NHP models, will greatly benefit the translation of stem cell therapy in other NHP disease models.

Keywords: Myocardial infarction, nonhuman primate models, Parkinson's disease, stem cell therapy, STEPS, stroke, translational studies, Type-1 diabetes


How to cite this article:
Choudhury GR, Kim J, Frost PA, Bastarrachea RA, Daadi MM. Nonhuman primate model in clinical modeling of diseases for stem cell therapy. Brain Circ 2016;2:141-5

How to cite this URL:
Choudhury GR, Kim J, Frost PA, Bastarrachea RA, Daadi MM. Nonhuman primate model in clinical modeling of diseases for stem cell therapy. Brain Circ [serial online] 2016 [cited 2022 Aug 8];2:141-5. Available from: http://www.braincirculation.org/text.asp?2016/2/3/141/192524


  Introduction Top


Human and nonhuman primates (NHPs) have many similar attributes, such as behavior, physiology, anatomy, biochemistry, organ mechanisms, and immunology.[1]

Research suggests that NHP animal models possess the capability to link the translational research between small animal models and humans. NHP models of human disease propose exceptional opportunities to advance stem cell-based therapy by addressing pertinent translational concerns associated with this research. These translational aspects include the application of autologous/allogeneic-induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived cellular products, concerns related to the immune response, delivery techniques in a clinical setting, and the evaluation of candidate cell line profiles when transplanted. NHP models offer unique opportunities to evaluate the complexity of the biochemical, physiological, behavioral, and imaging end points that are pertinent to current human conditions. Given the expense of specialized equipment and requirement of a highly specialized staff, the value of using these primates must be carefully assessed. Well-designed, less resource demanding, initial fundamental studies in small animal models, such as rodents, are essential before translating research into NHP models and ultimately into human trials. In this current report, we suggest that a robust dialog within each disease-specific research community focused on the development of relevant NHP models will greatly benefit the advance of the translation of stem cell research.


  Nonhuman Primate Disease Models For Stem Cell-Based Therapy Top


One of the most relevant NHP models is the neurotoxin 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1, 2, 3, 6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP)-induced NHP model of Parkinson's disease (PD). It provides significant preclinical opportunities that will ultimately demonstrate the safety and efficacy necessary to translate novel treatments into human trials. Like in humans,[2],[3] MPTP-treated NHPs exhibit most difficult symptoms of sporadic PD, such as static tremor,[4] that can only be recognized in certain PD monkey models. In addition, MPTP injections in NHPs result in side effects to anti-parkinsonian drugs as experienced by humans with PD, such as dyskinesias with Levodopa Pharmacotherapy,[5] cumulate the major constituent, α-synuclein, of Lewy bodies, the pathological trademark of PD,[6] and exhibit cognitive disruptions.[7] NHP models of PD have already been instrumental to our understanding of the differences in autologous versus allogeneic PSC-based therapy, their ability to innervate the putamen, and the appropriate differentiation profile of dopaminergic neurons.[8],[9],[10],[11],[12],[13],[14]

Numerous research facilities have focused on various stem cell-based regenerative therapies for PD. This will yield important translational data to prove the potential of this therapy and recognize the possible clinical obstacles that must be addressed. As seen in Phase I studies, PD patients receiving neural grafts have shown an increase in their quality of life,[15],[16] suggesting proof of the concept. However, the next hurdle to overcome remains the challenge of developing a predictable delivery system and sustainable stem cell populations that adhere to strict regulatory measures. Proven safety and efficacy of the therapy in NHP will effectively translate the product to commercial use and provide way to the development of a standardized treatment.

Type-1 diabetes mellitus (T1D) is an autoimmune disease that results in the permanent destruction of a specific cell type, the β-cells of the pancreatic  Islets of Langerhans More Details; therefore, it represents an ideal candidate for cell replacement therapy. Indeed, islet transplantation started in 1894 with much improvement in the 1990s [17] with a landmark paper reporting the insulin therapy independence in seven out of seven T1D patients.[18] Clinical centers with experience in the transplantation procedure achieved 80% insulin independence in 80% of patients during the 1st year posttransplantation.[19] However, there was a high incidence of failure in long-term associated mainly with poor pancreatic graft and complications from permanent immunosuppression. Other limitations and challenges within the current approach are the reliance on organ donations, tissues processing for isolating quality-controlled islet cells, lifelong immunosuppression, and the unreasonable long waiting list for patients. Thus, stem cell-based therapeutic strategies may eliminate or lower the severity of immunosuppression through autologous or stem cell microencapsulation, both promising approaches for T1D cell therapy. In the cell microencapsulation strategy, insulin-producing cells are loaded into a semipermeable capsule made from biodegradable materials that can allow for the secretion of insulin while providing the cells with nutrients and protection from the host immune system.[20],[21]

A relevant NHP model to address these clinical outcome concerns is crucial. A NHP model of T1D, the streptozotocin (STZ) NHP model of T1D, has been developed.[22] In this animal model, arterial and venous tether catheters enable continuous measurement of glucose, C-peptide, and other various biochemical measurements. STZ is administered intravenously to ablate the pancreatic β-cells and to induce diabetes. In this model, a comprehensive therapeutic strategy was implemented including a tether system, permanent indwelling catheter implants, an optimal hydration protocol, and pain and anxiety management. Glucose levels post-STZ administration were monitored moment by moment with continuous intravenous insulin therapy. Among the advantages of the STZ NHP model of T1D is that clinically relevant doses of stem cells and routes of delivery may be tested.

A recent study in this STZ-baboon model used an ultrasound-targeted microbubble destruction approach, in which nonviral gene therapy was targeted to pancreatic islets. STZ hyperglycemic-induced conscious tethered baboons received a gene cocktail comprising cyclin D2, CDK, and GLP1, which normalized intravenous glucose tolerance test curves. Immunohistochemistry demonstrated evidence of islet regeneration and restoration of β-cell mass.[22] STZ targets GLUT2 glucose transporter on β-cells and ablates them through the release of reactive oxygen species and alkylation of DNA.[23] Despite the ability to destroy β-cells, STZ is not necessarily representative of the autoimmune condition seen in T1D.[24] In this regard, transgenesis in NHPs [25],[26] may play an important role in developing relevant models that closely mimic the autoimmune component of T1D.

Human pluripotent stem cells have indisputable cardiomyocyte (CM)-generating abilities and have been extensively investigated for repair of the injured heart. Studies of human embryonic stem cell-derived CMs (hESC-CMs) in small animal models have shown favorable effects of stem cell therapy. The human heart has a limited capacity for regeneration after injury. NHP models of myocardial infarction are well established and essential for addressing critical preclinical questions before the initiation of clinical trials. Myocardial infarction is induced in NHP using a coronary catheter that engages the main coronary artery, a guide wire, and an angioplasty balloon. The angioplasty balloon is inserted into the anterior descending artery and inflated to block circulation for a predetermined period, usually 90 min followed by reperfusion. This animal model has been used to evaluate hESC-CMs and reprogramed somatic cells (iPSC) for their regenerative capacity of the heart.[27],[28],[29]

The characterization of an NHP model of focal ischemia reperfusion with a defined syndrome, impaired arm function, and finger dexterity in the context of the current NHP models has recently been reported.[30] In this review, we take the opportunity to address another relevant model, that is the transient global ischemia (TGI).[31],[32] Noting its difference from the clinical condition of brain ischemia, the induction of the TGI model may be a more appropriate model for cardiac arrest. However, the cell death events that precede an initial blood flow disruption are indicative of stroke-induced cell loss in distinct brain regions, particularly the hippocampus. Furthermore, the behavioral deficits evaluated in TGI animal models, such as memory decline, mirror the cognitive impairment assessed in clinical stroke patients.[33] The NHP model offers numerous opportunities, particularly the applicability to cerebral ischemia pathology.

NHP models can also offer important information for stroke rehabilitation that complement findings from rodent models. In a recent set of guidelines, the Stroke Therapy Academic Industry Roundtable (STAIR) has emphasized the necessity for NHP models of stroke for preclinical progress of neuroprotective therapies.[34] These guidelines were prompted by effective results in the laboratory that failed to produce beneficial results in the clinic. Certain features of stroke are consistent only with humans and NHPs, including the subcortical white matter injury and the internal capsule where the descending cortical pathways are found. Likewise, rats do not display the advanced development of the direct cortico-motorneuronal pathway, which dictates the precise motor skills impacted by stroke. Recent studies have described NHP models of stroke with excellent imaging, behavioral, and pathophysiological characterization [35],[36],[37],[38],[39],[40],[41] and have demonstrated the value of these models in preclinical advancement of therapeutic mediation.[42],[43],[44] The goal of NHP models is to accurately predict results, identify challenges, and increase the probability of successful therapy in human clinical trials. Various NHP species have demonstrated and validated the presence of ischemic neuronal loss in discrete regions of the brain after focal or global ischemia, and thus they would be crucial in understanding the pathophysiology of stroke and in stem cell translational research.


  Guidelines Proposed To Enforce Uniformity And Advance Further Research Top


Stem cell Therapeutics as an Emerging Paradigm for Stroke (STEPS)[45],[46],[47],[48] has established guidelines that will provide the foundation for investigating the translation of cell-based therapeutics from the laboratory to the clinic by using animal stroke models. As emphasized in the STEPS, testing the potential of anti-stroke therapeutics is critically dependent on the appropriate use of species and applicable stroke animal models, such as NHPs. While larger animals are favorable, the lack of a reputable NHP stroke model leads to an emphasis on safety rather than efficacy as an appropriate outcome measure. Although the STEPS welcomes different, available types of surgical methods, it highlights the importance of the “end point” rather than the “technique employed” to produce the stroke. The conditions of the stroke model should mirror the human disease state very closely to improve the success of translating therapeutics from the laboratory to the clinic.[46],[47]

A standard-of-care therapy (i.e., tissue plasminogen activator (tPA), rehabilitation therapy) must be established as a control group for translational studies. Currently, small animals such as rodents and rabbits receive such “best in class” control, yet accommodating this treatment to NHPs remains a challenge. The major obstacle in extending such control group to NHPs is the difficulty of standardizing the tPA treatment and rehabilitation therapy in these larger animal models. A solution to this would require NHP research personnel with expertise in this specific treatment and therapy.

Consideration must be given to the experimental therapeutic mechanism of action (MOA) in choosing the potential therapeutic windows for the various species utilized for stroke modeling. Subsequently, the stroke model and the species will be chosen that are deemed suitable to examine the MOA. For example, if the neuroprotective stage is targeted, the therapeutic window is expected to be during the acute stage of stroke. On the other hand, if the therapeutic MOA targets the neurorestorative stage instead, the window will most likely be within the subacute and chronic stages of the stroke. Small species have generally been utilized for examining therapeutic windows ranging from acute, subacute, and chronic stages of stroke. The use of smaller species can be attributed to the much less laborious postoperative care. Similarly, to humans and depending on the extent of the lesion, larger animal models of stroke, including NHPs, may require extensive postoperative monitoring and care. In addition, further studies are required to validate the standardization of NHP stroke models, particularly the chronic stage. This may restrict their use in examining therapeutic windows during the acute and subacute stages of stroke.

The NIH's National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke has advanced the integration of RIGOR guidelines for translational research, along with recommendations by STAIR and STEPS, to standardize stroke research procedures worldwide. The STAIR, STEPS, and RIGOR guidelines are similar in highlighting the importance of good laboratory practices (GLPs), such as the requirement for all animal modeling studies to uphold treatment conditions such as blinding, randomization, consideration of sex and age variables, and complete power and statistical analysis. In addition, when proposing translational applications and manuscripts, one must clearly present these GLP practices.[48] Translational Stroke Research and the Journal of Neurology and Neurophysiology have recognized this policy in their submissions. Although many animal models exist, finding optimal animal models is key to enhance the successful translation of novel therapeutics from the laboratory to the clinic. Equally significant to this is asserting a transparency of any person's conflict of interest that may possibly suggest bias in the study.[49]


  Future Direction For Nonhuman Primate Models In Translational Medicine Top


Given their close similarities to humans, the NHP model offers unique opportunities to understand biological mechanisms and translational applications with direct relevance to human conditions. Still, the value of using these primates must be carefully assessed, taking into account the expense of specialized equipment and requirement of highly specialized personnel. As such, carrying out initial fundamental studies in small animal models such as rodents may prove to be more efficient before translating such research to NHP models and eventually to first-in-human trials.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
  References Top

1.
Bluemel J, Korte S, Schenck E, Weinbauer G. The Nonhuman Primate in Nonclinical Drug Development and Safety Assessment. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 2015.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Davis GC, Williams AC, Markey SP, Ebert MH, Caine ED, Reichert CM, et al. Chronic Parkinsonism secondary to intravenous injection of meperidine analogues. Psychiatry Res 1979;1:249-54.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Langston JW, Ballard P, Tetrud JW, Irwin I. Chronic Parkinsonism in humans due to a product of meperidine-analog synthesis. Science 1983;219:979-80.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Bergman H, Raz A, Feingold A, Nini A, Nelken I, Hansel D, et al. Physiology of MPTP tremor. Mov Disord 1998;13 Suppl 3:29-34.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Bédard PJ, Di Paolo T, Falardeau P, Boucher R. Chronic treatment with L-DOPA, but not bromocriptine induces dyskinesia in MPTP-parkinsonian monkeys. Correlation with [3H] spiperone binding. Brain Res 1986;379:294-9.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Purisai MG, McCormack AL, Langston WJ, Johnston LC, Di Monte DA. Alpha-synuclein expression in the substantia nigra of MPTP-lesioned non-human primates. Neurobiol Dis 2005;20:898-906.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Schneider JS, Kovelowski CJ 2nd. Chronic exposure to low doses of MPTP. I. Cognitive deficits in motor asymptomatic monkeys. Brain Res 1990;519:122-8.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Emborg ME, Liu Y, Xi J, Zhang X, Yin Y, Lu J, et al. Induced pluripotent stem cell-derived neural cells survive and mature in the nonhuman primate brain. Cell Rep 2013;3:646-50.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Daadi MM, Grueter BA, Malenka RC, Redmond DE Jr., Steinberg GK. Dopaminergic neurons from midbrain-specified human embryonic stem cell-derived neural stem cells engrafted in a monkey model of Parkinson's disease. PLoS One 2012;7:e41120.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Takagi Y, Takahashi J, Saiki H, Morizane A, Hayashi T, Kishi Y, et al. Dopaminergic neurons generated from monkey embryonic stem cells function in a Parkinson primate model. J Clin Invest 2005;115:102-9.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Kriks S, Shim JW, Piao J, Ganat YM, Wakeman DR, Xie Z, et al. Dopamine neurons derived from human ES cells efficiently engraft in animal models of Parkinson's disease. Nature 2011;480:547-51.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Morizane A, Doi D, Kikuchi T, Okita K, Hotta A, Kawasaki T, et al. Direct comparison of autologous and allogeneic transplantation of iPSC-derived neural cells in the brain of a non-human primate. Stem Cell Reports 2013;1:283-92.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Doi D, Morizane A, Kikuchi T, Onoe H, Hayashi T, Kawasaki T, et al. Prolonged maturation culture favors a reduction in the tumorigenicity and the dopaminergic function of human ESC-derived neural cells in a primate model of Parkinson's disease. Stem Cells 2012;30:935-45.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Emborg ME, Zhang Z, Joers V, Brunner K, Bondarenko V, Ohshima S, et al. Intracerebral transplantation of differentiated human embryonic stem cells to hemiparkinsonian monkeys. Cell Transplant 2013;22:831-8.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Kefalopoulou Z, Politis M, Piccini P, Mencacci N, Bhatia K, Jahanshahi M, et al. Long-term clinical outcome of fetal cell transplantation for Parkinson disease: Two case reports. JAMA Neurol 2014;71:83-7.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Mendez I, Viñuela A, Astradsson A, Mukhida K, Hallett P, Robertson H, et al. Dopamine neurons implanted into people with Parkinson's disease survive without pathology for 14 years. Nat Med 2008;14:507-9.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Ricordi C, Strom TB. Clinical islet transplantation: Advances and immunological challenges. Nat Rev Immunol 2004;4:259-68.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Shapiro AM, Lakey JR, Ryan EA, Korbutt GS, Toth E, Warnock GL, et al. Islet transplantation in seven patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus using a glucocorticoid-free immunosuppressive regimen. N Engl J Med 2000;343:230-8.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Shapiro AM, Ricordi C, Hering B. Edmonton's islet success has indeed been replicated elsewhere. Lancet 2003;362:1242.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Agulnick AD, Ambruzs DM, Moorman MA, Bhoumik A, Cesario RM, Payne JK, et al. Insulin-producing endocrine cells differentiated in vitro from human embryonic stem cells function in macroencapsulation devices in vivo. Stem Cells Transl Med 2015;4:1214-22.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Vegas AJ, Veiseh O, Gürtler M, Millman JR, Pagliuca FW, Bader AR, et al. Long-term glycemic control using polymer-encapsulated human stem cell-derived beta cells in immune-competent mice. Nat Med 2016;22:306-11.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Frost PA, Chen S, Mezzles MJ, Voruganti VS, Nava-Gonzalez EJ, Arriaga-Cazares HE, et al. Successful pharmaceutical-grade streptozotocin (STZ)-induced hyperglycemia in a conscious tethered baboon (Papio hamadryas) model. J Med Primatol 2015;44:202-17.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Szkudelski T. The mechanism of alloxan and streptozotocin action in B cells of the rat pancreas. Physiol Res 2001;50:537-46.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Mordes JP, Bortell R, Blankenhorn EP, Rossini AA, Greiner DL. Rat models of type 1 diabetes: Genetics, environment, and autoimmunity. ILAR J 2004;45:278-91.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Chan AW, Chong KY, Martinovich C, Simerly C, Schatten G. Transgenic monkeys produced by retroviral gene transfer into mature oocytes. Science 2001;291:309-12.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Wolfgang MJ, Golos TG. Nonhuman primate transgenesis: Progress and prospects. Trends Biotechnol 2002;20:479-84.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Shiba Y, Fernandes S, Zhu WZ, Filice D, Muskheli V, Kim J, et al. Human ES-cell-derived cardiomyocytes electrically couple and suppress arrhythmias in injured hearts. Nature 2012;489:322-5.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Blin G, Nury D, Stefanovic S, Neri T, Guillevic O, Brinon B, et al. A purified population of multipotent cardiovascular progenitors derived from primate pluripotent stem cells engrafts in postmyocardial infarcted nonhuman primates. J Clin Invest 2010;120:1125-39.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Chong JJ, Yang X, Don CW, Minami E, Liu YW, Weyers JJ, et al. Human embryonic-stem-cell-derived cardiomyocytes regenerate non-human primate hearts. Nature 2014;510:273-7.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
McEntire CR, Choudhury GR, Torres A, Steinberg GK, Redmond DE Jr., Daadi MM. Impaired arm function and finger dexterity in a nonhuman primate model of stroke: Motor and cognitive assessments. Stroke 2016;47:1109-16.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Tabuchi E, Endo S, Ono T, Nishijo H, Kuze S, Kogure K. Hippocampal neuronal damage after transient forebrain ischemia in monkeys. Brain Res Bull 1992;29:685-90.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Hara K, Yasuhara T, Matsukawa N, Maki M, Masuda T, Yu G, et al. Hippocampal CA1 cell loss in a non-human primate model of transient global ischemia: A pilot study. Brain Res Bull 2007;74:164-71.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Yukie M, Yamaguchi K, Yamashima T. Impairments in recognition memory for object and for location after transient brain ischemia in monkeys. Rev Neurosci 2006;17:201-14.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Stroke Therapy Academic Industry Roundtable (STAIR). Recommendations for standards regarding preclinical neuroprotective and restorative drug development. Stroke 1999;30:2752-8.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Marshall JW, Ridley RM. Assessment of cognitive and motor deficits in a marmoset model of stroke. ILAR J 2003;44:153-60.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.
Freret T, Bouet V, Toutain J, Saulnier R, Pro-Sistiaga P, Bihel E, et al. Intraluminal thread model of focal stroke in the non-human primate. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2008;28:786-96.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.
Fukuda S, del Zoppo GJ. Models of focal cerebral ischemia in the nonhuman primate. ILAR J 2003;44:96-104.  Back to cited text no. 37
    
38.
Nudo RJ, Larson D, Plautz EJ, Friel KM, Barbay S, Frost SB. A squirrel monkey model of poststroke motor recovery. ILAR J 2003;44:161-74.  Back to cited text no. 38
    
39.
Huang J, Mocco J, Choudhri TF, Poisik A, Popilskis SJ, Emerson R, et al. A modified transorbital baboon model of reperfused stroke. Stroke 2000;31:3054-63.  Back to cited text no. 39
    
40.
Kuge Y, Yokota C, Tagaya M, Hasegawa Y, Nishimura A, Kito G, et al. Serial changes in cerebral blood flow and flow-metabolism uncoupling in primates with acute thromboembolic stroke. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2001;21:202-10.  Back to cited text no. 40
    
41.
Virley D, Hadingham SJ, Roberts JC, Farnfield B, Elliott H, Whelan G, et al. A new primate model of focal stroke: Endothelin-1-induced middle cerebral artery occlusion and reperfusion in the common marmoset. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2004;24:24-41.  Back to cited text no. 41
    
42.
Bahjat FR, Williams-Karnesky RL, Kohama SG, West GA, Doyle KP, Spector MD, et al. Proof of concept: Pharmacological preconditioning with a Toll-like receptor agonist protects against cerebrovascular injury in a primate model of stroke. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2011;31:1229-42.  Back to cited text no. 42
    
43.
Cook DJ, Teves L, Tymianski M. Treatment of stroke with a PSD-95 inhibitor in the gyrencephalic primate brain. Nature 2012;483:213-7.  Back to cited text no. 43
    
44.
Roitberg BZ, Mangubat E, Chen EY, Sugaya K, Thulborn KR, Kordower JH, et al. Survival and early differentiation of human neural stem cells transplanted in a nonhuman primate model of stroke. J Neurosurg 2006;105:96-102.  Back to cited text no. 44
    
45.
Borlongan CV. Cell therapy for stroke: Remaining issues to address before embarking on clinical trials. Stroke 2009;40 3 Suppl: S146-8.  Back to cited text no. 45
    
46.
Stem Cell Therapies as an Emerging Paradigm in Stroke Participants. Stem Cell Therapies as an Emerging Paradigm in Stroke (STEPS): Bridging basic and clinical science for cellular and neurogenic factor therapy in treating stroke. Stroke 2009;40:510-5.  Back to cited text no. 46
    
47.
Chopp M, Steinberg GK, Kondziolka D, Lu M, Bliss TM, Li Y, et al. Who's in favor of translational cell therapy for stroke: STEPS forward please? Cell Transplant 2009;18:691-3.  Back to cited text no. 47
    
48.
Borlongan CV, Chopp M, Steinberg GK, Bliss TM, Li Y, Lu M, et al. Potential of stem/progenitor cells in treating stroke: The missing steps in translating cell therapy from laboratory to clinic. Regen Med 2008;3:249-50.  Back to cited text no. 48
    
49.
Lapchak PA. Scientific rigor recommendations for optimizing the clinical applicability of translational research. J Neurol Neurophysiol 2012;3. pii: e111.  Back to cited text no. 49
    



This article has been cited by
1 Advances in the pathogenesis of Rett syndrome using cell models
Sijia Lu, Yongchang Chen, Zhengbo Wang
Animal Models and Experimental Medicine. 2022;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Preclinical Stroke Research and Translational Failure: A Birdís Eye View on Preventable Variables
Devendra Singh,Himika Wasan,K. H. Reeta
Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology. 2021;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Nonhuman Primate...
Guidelines Propo...
Future Direction...
References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed3338    
    Printed107    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded294    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 2    

Recommend this journal