|
 |
| REVIEW ARTICLE |
|
| Year : 2019 | Volume
: 5
| Issue : 3 | Page : 134-139 |
|
Activity of p53 in human amniotic fluid stem cells increases their potentiality as a candidate for stem cell therapy
Blaise Cozene1, Ivana Antonucci2, Liborio Stuppia2
1 Department of Neurosurgery and Brain Repair, College of Medicine, University of South Florida Morsani, Tampa, FL, USA
2 Department of Psychological, Health and Territorial Sciences, Laboratory of Molecular Genetics, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, G. d'Annunzio University, Chieti-Pescara, Italy
| Date of Submission | 29-May-2019 |
| Date of Decision | 01-Sep-2019 |
| Date of Acceptance | 03-Sep-2019 |
| Date of Web Publication | 30-Sep-2019 |
Correspondence Address:
Dr. Liborio Stuppia
Department of Psychological, Health and Territorial Sciences, Laboratory of Molecular Genetics, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, G. d'Annunzio University, Chieti-Pescara
Italy
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None  | Check |
DOI: 10.4103/bc.bc_35_19
The potential use of stem cells as a therapeutic treatment for many neurological disorders, such as stroke, has spiked an interest in their properties. Due to limitations of the present-day treatments, regenerative and protective therapies could prove very beneficial if a safe and effective treatment is identified. Using human amniotic fluid stem (hAFS) cells could theoretically provide both neuroprotective and regenerative properties to patients, and knowledge of p53's activity and function could be a key component in understanding the behavior and characteristics of these stem cells to harness their full potential. Many recent studies on p53 have provided new and valuable information that could give rise to new ideas for treatment options. More specifically, p53's activity inside hAFS cells lead them closer to becoming a potential therapeutic stem cell. Other neuroprotective treatments, such as hyperoxia and hypoxia sessions, are showing positive results. In combination, these data are helping to get closer to an effective treatment for neurological disorders.
Keywords: Cerebral ischemia, human amniotic fluid stem cells, p53, regenerative medicine, stem cell therapy
How to cite this article:
Cozene B, Antonucci I, Stuppia L. Activity of p53 in human amniotic fluid stem cells increases their potentiality as a candidate for stem cell therapy. Brain Circ 2019;5:134-9 |
How to cite this URL:
Cozene B, Antonucci I, Stuppia L. Activity of p53 in human amniotic fluid stem cells increases their potentiality as a candidate for stem cell therapy. Brain Circ [serial online] 2019 [cited 2023 Jun 5];5:134-9. Available from: http://www.braincirculation.org/text.asp?2019/5/3/134/268362 |
| Introduction: P53 Activity And Human Amniotic Fluid Stem Cells | |  |
In a study done on p53 inside amniotic fluid stem cells, it was found that undifferentiated human amniotic fluid stem (hAFS) cells express p53 at lower levels than cancerous cells. The p53 protein is found primarily in the nucleus of the hAFS cells. The anti-proliferative activity of p53 was limited. p53 regulates two target genes, namely igf2, a maternal imprinted gene and c-jun, a proto-oncogene. When DNA is damaged, the amount of p53 increases and consequently so does the activation of its target genes. Differentiation of amniotic fluid stem cells toward the neural lineage induces p53.[1] The hAFS cell line used was tested for several intracellular and surface markers. This was tested to confirm that the hAFS cells are in a middle state of pluripotency between that of ES cells and lineage-restricted adult progenitor cells.[2] hAFS cells showed the expression of various mesenchymal markers, several-related surface adhesion molecules, and stemness markers; however, they did not show hematopoietic surface markers.[1]
| P53 Location And Function In Human Amniotic Fluid Stem Cells | | |
It was determined that the p53 protein was localized in the nucleus.[1] However, p53's abundance was heterogeneous with some cells expressing high concentration but mostly low and variable levels of expression in the early and late passages, but data revealed that expression of the p53 protein remained the same with increased passage numbers. Due to the restrictions on using embryonic stem cells (ES), p53 abundance was compared with different tumor cells because they have relatively similar amounts to human ES cells.[1] Data concluded that hAFS cells had a much lower abundance of p53.
Previous findings demonstrating that p53's antiproliferative activity is compromised in murine ES cells was tested in hAFS cells.[3] p53 was downregulated, and cell number was monitored. Only a slight difference between control cells and downregulated cells was seen. Results were very similar to those in the murine ES cell study and indicated that the anti-proliferative activity of p53 in hAFS cells was compromised.[1]
| Igf2 And C-Jun Expressions Are Regulated By P53 In Human Amniotic Fluid Stem Cells | | |
p53 does not suppress the cell proliferation in unstressed hAFS cells.[1] Two noncanonical target genes which are induced by p53, c-jun and igf2 were measured. p53 was downregulated, and expression of genes was measured. c-jun expression was reduced, whereas igf2 expression was surprisingly increased. While the results of c-jun expression were congruent with previous findings, the igf2 results contradicted the results on ES cells. To further investigate, p53 was overexpressed but igf2 messenger RNA (mRNA) levels remained the same.[1]
| Induction Of P53 During Differentiation In Human Amniotic Fluid Stem Cells | | |
Due to the previous findings that p53 is involved in differentiation in ES and adult stem cells,[4],[5],[6] it was investigated whether p53 had any contribution to differentiation in hAFS cells. hAFS cells were differentiated over 24 days and monitored closely. Days 17–24 had the highest expression of p53, and at the same time, these were the days when Nestin, MAP2, and β-tubulin III were expressed.[1] Next, to see if the differentiation of hAFS cells was a p53-dependent event, the transcriptional activity of p53 was blocked. Following this, nestin amounts were seen to be reduced, which indicated that differentiation was reduced.[1]
| Human Amniotic Fluid Stem Cell Dna Damage Activates P53 | | |
After DNA damage, one of p53's jobs is to arrest the cell cycle and induce apoptosis.[7] p53 abundance and activity are increased in response to DNA damage.[8] It was found that p53 is important in the DNA damage response because of its activation of caspases and apoptosis.[9],[10],[11],[12] Caspase 3 is responsible for cleaving the poly [ADP-ribose] polymerase (PARP) protein. Therefore, PARP cleavage during DNA damage response was monitored under the normal expression of p53 and when p53 was downregulated. It was shown that when p53 was downregulated, the increase in cleavage was less than that of when p53 is normally expressed, showing that p53 is actively involved in DNA damage response.[1]
| Why P53? | | |
Since the identification of p53, an essential transcription factor found in multicellular organisms, it has been at the center of cancer research due to its contributions to many cellular processes such as proliferation, senescence, differentiation, apoptosis, ferroptosis, DNA repair, metabolism, angiogenesis, and autophagy.[4],[13],[14],[15],[16] As a transcription factor, p53 primarily functions by activating transcription of target genes.[1] However, its ability to directly interact with proapoptotic and antiapoptotic proteins also gives it the potential to promote apoptosis.[17] Concurrent with its role in adult somatic cells, p53 seems to be involved with self-renewal and differentiation of ES cells as well as some adult stem cells. p53 also possesses the ability to negatively regulate and maintain quiescence of adult stem cells such as neural and hematopoietic cells.[18],[19],[20] hAFS cells, found in a median state between ES cell pluripotency and lineage-restricted adult progenitor cells, possess the p53 tumor suppressor gene.[1],[21] hAFS cells also proliferate quickly as well as exhibit a wide differentiation range, including the ability to become hematopoietic, neurogenic, osteogenic, chondrogenic, adipogenic, renal, and hepatic lineages.[21],[22],[23] Alongside these promising attributes, during laboratory trial, when hAFS cells were transplanted into nude mice, they did not cause the formation of teratomas while ES cells did.[24] Although very promising in the potentiality of being a source of therapeutic stem cells, the activity of p53 in hAFS cells is not well known. Defects or loss in p53 function can have detrimental effects on genomic stability.[1] This article presents that p53 is active in hAFS cells and is found primarily in the nucleus. Under nonstressed conditions, p53's anti-proliferative activity is limited, however, becomes active in response to DNA damage. Furthermore, two genes are regulated by p53 in hAFS cells: c-jun, a proto-oncogene, and igf2, a gene important in cellular proliferation and development.[1]
| Human Amniotic Fluid Stem Cells Could Be A Potential Therapeutic Stem Cell | | |
Several lines of investigation were conducted to identify a potential cell type for therapeutic stem cell injections into humans. Recent findings have found that the once-promising candidate of ES cells, frequently generate mosaic alterations and that p53 is often mutated in human ES cell lines.[25],[26]
The ideal stem cell candidate would have no ethical controversy, be easy to obtain, divide rapidly in culture, and shows broad plasticity.[1] Along with fulfilling all these requirements, hAFS cells do not form tumors when transplanted into mice. ES cells, on the other hand, formed teratomas when transplanted into mice.[24],[27] The function and activity of p53, an important tumor suppressor protein, must be identified before hAFS cells are used in therapy. Overall, hAFS cells show great potential to 1 day be used as a therapeutic stem cell.
When initially identified, the p53 protein was discovered to be localized in the nucleus of hAFS cells.[1] Consistent with these data, the results of a previous report locate p53 in the nucleus of murine ES cells.[3] Other previous reports about p53 mRNA concentration also stay congruous with the results that p53 protein levels remained relatively constant and did not change with increasing passage numbers.[28],[29]
While wild-type p53 is an anti-proliferative protein, when mutated, it is commonly associated with tumor growth.[1] Therefore, the effect of p53 on the proliferation rate of hAFS cells was monitored. The results suggested no difference in proliferation capacity between control cells and cells where p53 was downregulated.[1] These data are consistent with the previous findings with murine ES cells where anti-proliferative activity of p53 was compromised.[3]
Regulation of two noncanonical target genes of p53, c-jun, and igf2, was measured in hAFS cells. These genes were also regulated by p53 in ES cells.[3] The result was that repression of c-jun by p53 in hAFS-matched previous data from ES cell research. However, igf2 mRNA was repressed in ES cells, it was found that in hAFS cells, p53 induced igf2 mRNA levels.[3]c-jun, a proto-oncogene, achieves its growth-promoting function through heterodimerization with c-Fos, binding to AP-1 responsive elements in promoters of their target genes, and repression of tumor suppressor genes, namely p53, p21, and p16.[30]c-jun has also been shown to have the ability to directly bind to and repress the p53 promoter.[1]
igf2, a proto-oncogene involved in the development, is another target gene of p53 and is often overexpressed in tumors.[31],[32] While no reduction in igf2 mRNA was seen during overexpression of p53, the downregulation of p53 strongly induced igf2 mRNA.[1] There is no clear understanding of why this inconsistency exists. Furthermore, the expression of igf2 was seen in cells with a female karyotype, but not male karyotyped cells.[1] This could be due to that eventually in males, igf2 expression is not required and that during deletion of the igf2 gene, male cells are still viable. However, female cells are strongly dependent on igf2.[33]
As differentiation progressed in hAFS cells, p53 was strongly induced.[1] When transcription of p53 during differentiation was blocked, it resulted in decreased nestin amounts, exhibiting that p53 contributes to the differentiation of hAFS cells.[1] Surprisingly, p53's increase in abundance during differentiation contradicts previous studies in ES cells, where p53 abundance decreased as differentiation progressed.[16],[34],[35],[36] p53 plays a role in the DNA damage response.[37] In hAFS cell experiments, p53 became activated and its levels increased, and target genes p21 and mdm2 were induced. Interestingly, it was found that in response to the DNA damage, the cleavage of PARP, a DNA repair protein, was a partly p53-dependent event.[1] No other DNA damage agents were tested, and further experimentation must be done to determine if this response is specific to some agents or universal among many.
Amniotic fluid contains cells derived from the fetus and amnion; there is a possibility of donor-to-donor heterogeneity that could influence proliferation rate, differentiation capability, and DNA damage response.[1] These experiments were conducted using a single donor hAFS cell line. Further experiments must be conducted with different donors to rule out any genetic factors that would influence the hAFS cell activity.
In summary, evidence suggests that p53 is active in hAFS cells. Differences in p53 activity between hAFS cells and ES cells have been indicated, leading to inferences that there is no generalized activity of p53 across stem cells.[1] This is also demonstrated by differences in p53 expression across different mesenchymal stem cell types.[38] While hAFS cells are of potential usage for stem cell therapy, heterogeneity must be further investigated to rule out any possibility of differences in the behavior of cells among donors.
| The Further Investigation Of The Role Of P53 In Human Amniotic Fluid Stem Cells Could Lead To Pioneering Medical Advancements | | |
Stroke is a leading cause of death and often results in long-term disability.[39] Developing safe and effective treatments poses a great challenge. With a few current treatment options, stroke researchers are identifying many possible therapies to better treat stroke patients. Currently, the only stroke treatment approved by the Food and Drug Administration is a thrombolytic drug or a tissue plasminogen activator.[39] While it has been demonstrated effective in dissolving clots, there is a massive time constraint due to the requirement of administering the drug within 4.5 h after a stroke.[39] Other treatments such as surgical thrombectomy or embolectomy are effective, but pose more risks with older patients.[39] Neuroprotectant treatments and regenerative therapies could also prove very beneficial as effective treatments for strokes. Stem cells could potentially serve as both a regenerative and neuroprotective agent. However, stem cell treatments often lead to ethical controversy, and it is challenging to secure an ideal candidate.
hAFS cells have shown great potential to be utilized as therapeutic stem cells [Figure 1]. As an ideal candidate, hAFS cells display pluripotency in that they can differentiate into all three germ layers. Furthermore, there are minimal ethical issues surrounding the harvest and usage of hAFS cells. They are harvested during amniocentesis and provide a heterogeneous cell pool, including amniotic fluid-specific cells, fibroblastic cells, and epithelioid cells. Derived hAFS cells can become human amniotic mesenchymal stromal cells that serve as anti-inflammatory and anti-fibrotic agents effective in treating other neurological diseases.[40] hAFS cells show great efficacy in treating neurological conditions such as Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, spinal cord injury, and more.[40] A study was done to investigate the regenerative properties of hAFS cells after an ischemic-reperfusion injury was induced in mice. First, a 60-min middle cerebral artery occlusion was induced, followed by a 7-day reperfusion phase. Intracerebroventricular delivery of hAFS cells was completed, resulting in reduced neurological sequelae as well as behavioral deficits.[40] Furthermore, behavioral tests were recorded before and after the occlusion, and transplantation of hAFS cells was completed on day 35. The data suggest a lessened infarct volume, reduction in neuron loss, memory degradation, learning deficiency, and greater cell proliferation.[21] Along with promising neuroregenerative function, another study with mice showed that stem cells have neuroprotective abilities with the release of trophic factors.[41] Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) was monitored and demonstrated that when overexpressed there were fewer neurological deficits and smaller infarct volumes than in mice; where VEGF was not overexpressed.[41] It is thought that this result is due to VEGF inhibition of pro-apoptotic genes such as p53.[41] Another study indicated that transplantation of ES cells into rats often formed teratomas, whereas hAFS cells did not.[42] This could be due to differences in the activity of p53 in the two cell types. | Figure 1: The use of human amniotic fluid stem cell as donor transplantable cells offers many therapeutic and logistical advantages
Click here to view |
p53 is an important tumor suppressor gene in multicellular eukaryotes while also possessing apoptotic function. This gene could be a major factor in which stem cells could potentially be a therapeutic agent in stroke recovery and protection. Utilizing knowledge of p53 in the brain suggests other treatment possibilities. Research has shown that following an ischemic event, p53 mRNA and protein are upregulated, leading to an increase in p53-dependent apoptosis in the penumbra.[43] Utilizing this knowledge, treatment options arise such as a study done on methylene blue (MB) for neuroprotective function. This study found that MB modulated the p53-Bax-Bcl2-caspase3 cascade inhibiting apoptotic signaling pathways. It was also found that MB modulated the p53-5' adenosine monophosphate -activated protein kinase-Tuberous Sclerosis Complex 2- mammalian target of rapamycin cascade, enhancing autophagic signaling pathways.[44] The manipulation of p53-induced pathways with treatment shows positive results, and the studies should be continued to find new ways to manipulate p53 pathways, producing better stroke outcomes. Stem cells also need to present neural markers,[45] and p53 may provide a way to regulate these. In particular, nestin, implicated in radial growth of axons, is demonstrated to be regulated by p53. In an experiment where p53 transcription was suppressed, nestin abundance was lowered, suggesting that nestin is regulated in some way by the p53 gene.[1] Research on other areas of the body regarding ischemic-reperfusion injury has produced results that could potentially be useful in stroke research. Organ transplant is a common area with ischemic-reperfusion injury, and researchers in this field have begun looking at ischemic conditioning as a way of preconditioning the body to tolerate prolonged ischemia.[46] This runs alongside previous stroke research where stem cells are preconditioned by mild hypoxia exposure before transplanted into the brain.[47] Hypoxia causes the hypoxia-inducible factor-1 alpha to increase the expression of its target genes thought to provide neuroprotection.[48] Also proving effective as preconditioning treating is hyperbaric oxygen treatment. Introducing hyperoxia over various treatment sessions before an ischemic event can induce mild stress and prepare cells for future stressors.[49] Further research should be conducted to gain more knowledge on hypoxic and hyperoxic preconditioning to treat ischemic events.
| Conclusions | | |
Knowledge of activity and function of p53 in stem cells, the brain, and signaling pathways can lead to potential treatment options. p53 still requires much more research, especially regarding hAFS cells. However, when compared to ES cells, there are many differences that make hAFS cells a promising potential candidate for stroke therapy.
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References | | |
| 1. | Rodrigues M, Antonucci I, Elabd S, Kancherla S, Marchisio M, Blattner C, et al. P53 is active in human amniotic fluid stem cells. Stem Cells Dev 2018;27:1507-17.  |
| 2. | Cananzi M, Atala A, De Coppi P. Stem cells derived from amniotic fluid: New potentials in regenerative medicine. Reprod Biomed Online 2009;18 Suppl 1:17-27. |
| 3. | Yan H, Solozobova V, Zhang P, Armant O, Kuehl B, Brenner-Weiss G, et al. P53 is active in murine stem cells and alters the transcriptome in a manner that is reminiscent of mutant p53. Cell Death Dis 2015;6:e1662. |
| 4. | Olivos DJ, Mayo LD. Emerging non-canonical functions and regulation by p53: P53 and stemness. Int J Mol Sci 2016;17. pii: E1982. |
| 5. | Jain AK, Allton K, Iacovino M, Mahen E, Milczarek RJ, Zwaka TP, et al. P53 regulates cell cycle and microRNAs to promote differentiation of human embryonic stem cells. PLoS Biol 2012;10:e1001268. |
| 6. | He Y, de Castro LF, Shin MH, Dubois W, Yang HH, Jiang S, et al. P53 loss increases the osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow stromal cells. Stem Cells 2015;33:1304-19. |
| 7. | Boehme KA, Blattner C. Regulation of p53 – Insights into a complex process. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol 2009;44:367-92. |
| 8. | Kastan MB, Onyekwere O, Sidransky D, Vogelstein B, Craig RW. Participation of p53 protein in the cellular response to DNA damage. Cancer Res 1991;51:6304-11. |
| 9. | Corbet SW, Clarke AR, Gledhill S, Wyllie AH. P53-dependent and -independent links between DNA-damage, apoptosis and mutation frequency in ES cells. Oncogene 1999;18:1537-44. |
| 10. | D'Sa-Eipper C, Leonard JR, Putcha G, Zheng TS, Flavell RA, Rakic P, et al. DNA damage-induced neural precursor cell apoptosis requires p53 and caspase 9 but neither bax nor caspase 3. Development 2001;128:137-46. |
| 11. | Akhtar RS, Geng Y, Klocke BJ, Roth KA. Neural precursor cells possess multiple p53-dependent apoptotic pathways. Cell Death Differ 2006;13:1727-39. |
| 12. | Grandela C, Pera MF, Grimmond SM, Kolle G, Wolvetang EJ. P53 is required for etoposide-induced apoptosis of human embryonic stem cells. Stem Cell Res 2007;1:116-28. |
| 13. | Vogelstein B, Lane D, Levine AJ. Surfing the p53 network. Nature 2000;408:307-10. |
| 14. | Vousden KH, Prives C. Blinded by the light: The growing complexity of p53. Cell 2009;137:413-31. |
| 15. | Levine AJ, Oren M. The first 30 years of p53: Growing ever more complex. Nat Rev Cancer 2009;9:749-58. |
| 16. | Sabapathy K, Klemm M, Jaenisch R, Wagner EF. Regulation of ES cell differentiation by functional and conformational modulation of p53. EMBO J 1997;16:6217-29. |
| 17. | Moll UM, Wolff S, Speidel D, Deppert W. Transcription-independent pro-apoptotic functions of p53. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2005;17:631-6. |
| 18. | Solozobova V, Blattner C. P53 in stem cells. World J Biol Chem 2011;2:202-14. |
| 19. | Meletis K, Wirta V, Hede SM, Nistér M, Lundeberg J, Frisén J. P53 suppresses the self-renewal of adult neural stem cells. Development 2006;133:363-9. |
| 20. | Liu Y, Elf SE, Miyata Y, Sashida G, Liu Y, Huang G, et al. P53 regulates hematopoietic stem cell quiescence. Cell Stem Cell 2009;4:37-48. |
| 21. | Diaco NS, Diamandis ZM, Borlongan CV. Amniotic fluid-derived stem cells as an effective cell source for transplantation therapy in stroke. Brain Circ 2015;1:119-24. [Full text] |
| 22. | Bossolasco P, Montemurro T, Cova L, Zangrossi S, Calzarossa C, Buiatiotis S, et al. Molecular and phenotypic characterization of human amniotic fluid cells and their differentiation potential. Cell Res 2006;16:329-36. |
| 23. | De Coppi P, Bartsch G Jr., Siddiqui MM, Xu T, Santos CC, Perin L, et al. Isolation of amniotic stem cell lines with potential for therapy. Nat Biotechnol 2007;25:100-6. |
| 24. | Davydova DA, Vorotelyak EA, Smirnova YA, Zinovieva RD, Romanov YA, Kabaeva NV, et al. Cell phenotypes in human amniotic fluid. Acta Naturae 2009;1:98-103. |
| 25. | Merkle FT, Ghosh S, Kamitaki N, Mitchell J, Avior Y, Mello C, et al. Human pluripotent stem cells recurrently acquire and expand dominant negative P53 mutations. Nature 2017;545:229-33. |
| 26. | Baker D, Hirst AJ, Gokhale PJ, Juarez MA, Williams S, Wheeler M, et al. Detecting genetic mosaicism in cultures of human pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cell Reports 2016;7:998-1012. |
| 27. | Moschidou D, Mukherjee S, Blundell MP, Drews K, Jones GN, Abdulrazzak H, et al. Valproic acid confers functional pluripotency to human amniotic fluid stem cells in a transgene-free approach. Mol Ther 2012;20:1953-67. |
| 28. | Poloni A, Maurizi G, Babini L, Serrani F, Berardinelli E, Mancini S, et al. Human mesenchymal stem cells from chorionic villi and amniotic fluid are not susceptible to transformation after extensive in vitro expansion. Cell Transplant 2011;20:643-54. |
| 29. | Phermthai T, Pokathikorn P, Wichitwiengrat S, Thongbopit S, Tungprasertpol K, Julavijitphong S. P53 mutation and epigenetic imprinted IGF2/H19 gene analysis in mesenchymal stem cells derived from amniotic fluid, amnion, endometrium, and Wharton's Jelly. Stem Cells Dev 2017;26:1344-54. |
| 30. | Shaulian E, Karin M. AP-1 in cell proliferation and survival. Oncogene 2001;20:2390-400. |
| 31. | Zhang L, Kashanchi F, Zhan Q, Zhan S, Brady JN, Fornace AJ, et al. Regulation of insulin-like growth factor II P3 promotor by p53: A potential mechanism for tumorigenesis. Cancer Res 1996;56:1367-73. |
| 32. | Ohlsson C, Kley N, Werner H, LeRoith D. P53 regulates insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) receptor expression and IGF-I-induced tyrosine phosphorylation in an osteosarcoma cell line: Interaction between p53 and sp1. Endocrinology 1998;139:1101-7. |
| 33. | Haley VL, Barnes DJ, Sandovici I, Constancia M, Graham CF, Pezzella F, et al. Igf2 pathway dependency of the trp53 developmental and tumour phenotypes. EMBO Mol Med 2012;4:705-18. |
| 34. | Solozobova V, Rolletschek A, Blattner C. Nuclear accumulation and activation of p53 in embryonic stem cells after DNA damage. BMC Cell Biol 2009;10:46. |
| 35. | Rogel A, Popliker M, Webb CG, Oren M. P53 cellular tumor antigen: Analysis of mRNA levels in normal adult tissues, embryos, and tumors. Mol Cell Biol 1985;5:2851-5. |
| 36. | Lin T, Chao C, Saito S, Mazur SJ, Murphy ME, Appella E, et al. P53 induces differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells by suppressing Nanog expression. Nat Cell Biol 2005;7:165-71. |
| 37. | Vitale I, Manic G, De Maria R, Kroemer G, Galluzzi L. DNA damage in stem cells. Mol Cell 2017;66:306-19. |
| 38. | D'Alimonte I, Lannutti A, Pipino C, Di Tomo P, Pierdomenico L, Cianci E, et al. Wnt signaling behaves as a “master regulator” in the osteogenic and adipogenic commitment of human amniotic fluid mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cell Rev Rep 2013;9:642-54. |
| 39. | Leng T, Xiong ZG. Treatment for ischemic stroke: From thrombolysis to thrombectomy and remaining challenges. Brain Circ 2019;5:8-11. [ PUBMED] [Full text] |
| 40. | Anthony S, Borlongan CV. Recent progress in regenerative medicine for brain disorders. Brain Circ 2017;3:121-3. [ PUBMED] [Full text] |
| 41. | Chau M, Zhang J, Wei L, Yu SP. Regeneration after stroke: Stem cell transplantation and trophic factors. Brain Circ 2016;2:86-94. [ PUBMED] [Full text] |
| 42. | Antonucci I, Crowley MG, Stuppia L. Amniotic fluid stem cell models: A tool for filling the gaps in knowledge for human genetic diseases. Brain Circ 2017;3:167-74. [ PUBMED] [Full text] |
| 43. | Dewan SN, Wang Y, Yu S. Drug treatments that optimize endogenous neurogenesis as a therapeutic option for stroke. Brain Circ 2017;3:152-5. [ PUBMED] [Full text] |
| 44. | Jiang Z, Duong TQ. Methylene blue treatment in experimental ischemic stroke: A mini review. Brain Circ 2016;2:48-53. [ PUBMED] [Full text] |
| 45. | Borlongan CV. Amniotic fluid as a source of engraftable stem cells. Brain Circ 2017;3:175-9. [ PUBMED] [Full text] |
| 46. | Kristin V. Ischemic conditioning in organ transplant. Cond Med 2018;1:212-9. |
| 47. | Leak RK. Conditioning against the pathology of Parkinson's disease. Cond Med 2018;1:143-62. |
| 48. | Cuomo O, Vinciguerra A, Cepparulo P, Anzilotti S, Brancaccio P, Formisano L, et al. Differences and similarities in neuroprotective molecular pathways activated by distinct preconditioning inducers. Cond Med 2018;1:187-203. |
| 49. | Liska GM, Lippert T, Russo E, Nieves N, Borlongan CV. A dual role for hyperbaric oxygen in stroke neuroprotection: Preconditioning of the brain and stem cells. Cond Med 2018;1:151-66. |
[Figure 1]
|
Search Pubmed for